EXCLUSIVE: Federal District Court Judge Issues Ruling That DESTROYS COVID-19 Jab Mandates; Cites Ivermectin & Natural Immunity

Share The Story

A United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida made the best ruling I’ve seen to obliterate COVID-19 jab mandates.

And the judge’s based ruling uses real science to show why these medical mandates mock public health.

First, here’s a little background behind this case.

Ascension Sacred Heart issued a COVID-19 jab mandate for all employees to take the experimental injection by November 12th.

Hospital workers resisting the mandate have protested for the past few months:

From WEAR-TV:

Ascension Sacred Heart’s vaccine mandate went into effect on Friday.

Unvaccinated employees were told Thursday was their last day to get the COVID vaccine or they would be let go.

Ascension Sacred Heart will allow those employees to be reinstated if they get vaccinated by Jan. 4, which is the federal deadline for hospital employees to get the shot.

Some unvaccinated employees have told Channel 3 they are willing to lose their jobs rather than get vaccinated.

While the federal COVID-19 mandate remains under judicial review, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed their stay on the unconstitutional measure.

In the mean time, Ascension Sacred Heart employees filed a lawsuit against the hospital for the egregious act of medical discrimination.

T. Kent Wetherell II was the federal district court judge that reviewed the case.

Here’s brief background on Judge Wetherell II from Ballotpedia:

T. Kent Wetherell II is a judge on the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. On May 7, 2018, President Donald Trump (R) nominated Wetherell to a seat on this court.[1] The United States Senate confirmed Wetherell on July 10, 2019, by a vote of 78-15.[2] He received commission on July 12, 2019.

Here’s his ruling:

Each point emphasized by Judge T. Kent Wetherell II destroys the COVID-19 narrative and lays a framework for workers unjustly fired by their employers.

In the ruling, Judge Wetherell II cited:

-COVID’s low mortality rate and mild severity for most individuals

-The risk-benefit ratio of the jabs weighing more toward risk

-Protection provided by natural immunity

-Alternative treatments like Ivermectin & monoclonal antibodies

-The jabs do NOT prevent contraction and transmission of the virus

The points presented by Judge Wetherell II describe COVID-19 jab mandates for what they are:

A Policy Failure

Mandates don’t keep people safe or save lives.

They trample on human rights and civil liberties.


Share The Story

Add Comment