Let’s take a brief glimpse at the Nuremberg Code.
Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
The first principle of the Nuremberg Code clearly defines the human subject must give voluntary consent to participate in a medical experiment.
It’s absolutely essential.
And this voluntary consent must come without the intervention of force, which includes duress or coercion.
Here’s a newsflash for the governments and employers who threatened individuals by taking their jobs over this medical experiment:
It’s a violation of the Nuremberg Code, and you’re no better than the Nazi war criminals that experimented on human beings during WWII.
David Nabarro, the WHO’s Special Envoy on COVID-19, didn’t rule out the possibility of mandating the experimental COVID-19 injections on individuals.
After this clip, there’s no doubt these same Nazi war criminals run the WHO. They want to use human beings around the world as toys for their disgusting experiments.
The WHO’s special envoy on COVID says vaccines should only be mandatory “as a last resort” in case of “absolute refusal.”
In other words, the vaccines are optional—unless you decide not to take one. The WHO officially trashes the Nuremberg Code. pic.twitter.com/JxftW2k4hF
— Michael P Senger (@MichaelPSenger) November 22, 2021
In other words, you can say no all you want, but we have the final say on giving you a vaccine or mRNA gene therapy injection.
Nabarro states, “we’re in this together,” but that’s obviously a sick, twisted lie for this medical authoritarian.
The WHO wants absolute control over human beings around the planet, and they’ll use puppet governments to achieve their goal.
With this statement, the global health authority has officially spat in the face of the code of ethical medical behavior established after heinous WWII-era crimes.
The International covenant on Civil and Political rights and the Nuremberg code were put in place to protect the citizens of the world from government abuse of power and overreach so how can a representative from WHO completely ignore these fundamental rights. https://t.co/Fc2Ae3ioFh
— Soraya Abdullah 🌺 (@sorayinsights) November 22, 2021
“In other words, the vaccines are optional—unless you decide not to take one. The WHO officially trashes the Nuremberg Code.” https://t.co/IiC8lFMrQ9
— Helen’s Lunch (@HelensLunch) November 22, 2021
Yet another commentator who clearly doesn’t know what the Nuremberg Code actually is. https://t.co/Tx3M6y7qf7
— Steven Wilson (@swilsonnews) November 22, 2021
— BrokenJug (@broken_jug) November 23, 2021